- #QUANTUM OF SOLACE PC SPECS HOW TO#
- #QUANTUM OF SOLACE PC SPECS FULL VERSION#
- #QUANTUM OF SOLACE PC SPECS MOVIE#
- #QUANTUM OF SOLACE PC SPECS UTORRENT#
How To Run Download And Install James Bond 007 Quantum Of Solace.
#QUANTUM OF SOLACE PC SPECS FULL VERSION#
#QUANTUM OF SOLACE PC SPECS MOVIE#
I do Movie Only if the M2TS stream is bigger than say 30GB(In that case I just use tsMuxer). I doubt its any faster than using just the C: drive, but it keeps C: from getting badly defragmented. So I have three HDDs in operation for each copy. I put the original rip from AnyDVD-HD on another hot swappable drive for the same reasons.
I put the working folder on a hot swappable drive because they get filled up fairly quickly (I make a BD9 & BD25 copy for every movie) I put the BD-Rebuilder program files on my C: Drive. What settings are you using for copying? Full or Movie Only? Quality Setting? What size output? (BD5, BD9, BD25) just a rough idea of what they should expect from whichever CPU.
So what I guess I'm trying to point out is that there will never be a completely scientific finding with any of the times posted by anyone here. However, when Massiah states that his Q9650 takes on average 11-12 hours, then he knows it should, and can, be better. Exactly the case with my system when I went from my E6600 to the Q9550. I've found Dark Shikari's comment, about a general improvement being twice as fast if you went from a Dual Core to a Quad Core, to be pretty accurate. I think that the main realization should be what each person can expect from different CPUs they may be considering upgrading too. Even you confirmed that the 4 hour i7 time he mentioned is realistic since you state that your i7 does some in 4 hours as well.
I think everyone here realizes that these are all estimated ballpark averages. What you're proposing is also moot unless eveyone also has the same configuration and mobo too then, if you're going to base it only as you are stating.Įvery time posted by everyone will only be a generalized figure per each type of CPU since everyone's systems will also have different motherboard tendencies & hardware configurations, system processes configurations, and even go as far as stating whether or not the individual is overclocking effificiently or not. Even then it's a waste of time since there is already loads of data available. Your're better off just using the x264 benchmark clip Dark Shakiri talks about. For me on my Core i7 920 at 4.1Ghz it takes between 2-4 hours. Time stated are meaningless without everyone using the same disc. I mean I have it installed on my desktop but the Workfiles folder is on another hard drive.Ĭould you tell me how you have yours setup and maybe I can run that since we have similar specs? I think I remember reading somewhere about someone running BDRB on the C: Drive but, not in the Program files. Both hard drives that contain the source folder and the work folder spin at 7200RPMs.) I don't have any web pages open or anything else running.Īs you know, when BDRB runs it probably sucks up all the core processing in the Q9650 I rip the BluRay to one hard drive and I use another for rebuilding the files( I have 4 internal hard drives and 4 external.
#QUANTUM OF SOLACE PC SPECS UTORRENT#
I only, maybe have uTorrent running in the background. A Q9650 should be doing this work in much less time than you're experiencing, unless maybe you're using the Blu-Ray disc as the source instead of ripping it to the hard drive for conversion. I'd recommend you take a look to see if you have something running that is conflicting with the BD-Rebuilder operation. I have a second PC, which is actually my primary BD-Rebuilder machine, that has a Q9550, 4gb RAM, and is running XP Pro. I just don't have a bunch of stuff running in the background and no other codecs besides ffdshow.